<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Sites vs. Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/web-sites-vs-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/web-sites-vs-blogs/</link>
	<description>Affiliate marketing news and opinion from Shawn Collins, an affiliate marketer since 1997, and co-founder of Affiliate Summit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Collins</title>
		<link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/web-sites-vs-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-47819</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.affiliatetip.com/?p=1731#comment-47819</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - I meant to convey that a blog is a type of site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; I meant to convey that a blog is a type of site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric W. Cahoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/web-sites-vs-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-47710</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric W. Cahoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.affiliatetip.com/?p=1731#comment-47710</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Cameron on this one.  All blogs are website, but not all websites are blogs.  The diffining feature in my mind is the level of interaction a vistor can have with a posters information.  

If it it a living breathing dialog then more than likely it is a blog in todays age; however, we must remember that this criteria could also be applied to a forum and thus it not totally correct.  Either way, as Cameron pointed out the CMS used plays no part in wether a site is a blog or not, rather it is the interaction between the individuals visiting the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Cameron on this one.  All blogs are website, but not all websites are blogs.  The diffining feature in my mind is the level of interaction a vistor can have with a posters information.  </p>
<p>If it it a living breathing dialog then more than likely it is a blog in todays age; however, we must remember that this criteria could also be applied to a forum and thus it not totally correct.  Either way, as Cameron pointed out the CMS used plays no part in wether a site is a blog or not, rather it is the interaction between the individuals visiting the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/web-sites-vs-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-47612</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.affiliatetip.com/?p=1731#comment-47612</guid>
		<description>Hey Shawn,

I agree with you on the point that a blog and site are actually one and the same. But I don&#039;t think you classify a site as a blog simply on the CMS it uses, but rather on the voice and level of interaction it provides. In the case of a blog, the interaction would be on a more personal level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shawn,</p>
<p>I agree with you on the point that a blog and site are actually one and the same. But I don&#8217;t think you classify a site as a blog simply on the CMS it uses, but rather on the voice and level of interaction it provides. In the case of a blog, the interaction would be on a more personal level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
