Comments on: Pay-Per-Play Advertising for Affiliates

By: Pratibha

Pratibha — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:26:31 +0000

I am inclined to agree with some here that Per-per-play sounds like they are going to be very obtrusive. When I first found out about this innovative ad idea, I went wow! Innovative, yes. But tangible (in the long run), probably not.
I believe each web user today like to feel empowered and PPP doesnt seem to endorse that.

By: Khaja Moinuddin

Khaja Moinuddin — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:41:20 +0000

Hi
This looks awesome.Very good way of keeping visitors sticked to the site without leaving and the same time getting paid through ppc.ppp will definitely turn millionaoires to billionaires in much less time.Now Adsense have a very good competitor ahead.Lets see what google will do to cover up this competition.

By: david lewis

david lewis — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:11:35 +0000

ALERT – READ THIS
http://imscamalert.com/2007/12/14/payperplay-the-next-generation-of-intrusive-internet-marketing/lead-story

By: YourPayPerPlay

YourPayPerPlay — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:28:56 +0000

Personally, I think this form of advertising is more intrusive than pop up ads at the moment. The reason is that Iâ€™m sometimes irritated by websites with audio and I can imagine how much more irritated I will be with a 5 second audio ad. Additionally, our speakers may not be configured at the right volume and it may be too loud or soft. If itâ€™s too loud, it irritates me more. If itâ€™s too soft, I canâ€™t hear it and the advertisers lose their dollars.

Despite my own personal comments, I still think this type of advertising is innovative and we never know what may or may not work. There are dozens of webmasters who are in for a quick profit and do not mind turning their visitors away anyway. Besides, the advertisements on MSN will seem to me as intrusive if itâ€™s related to me first since it plays a video when I roll my cursor over somewhere the bottom of MSN window. However, I have been entertained by those videos so many times that I do in fact like it.

By: Daniel M. Clark

Daniel M. Clark — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:43:47 +0000

And from that response, I take away two things: first, people like you don’t care about anyone but yourselves and people who make a lot of noise. Nice. Second, it’s easy for someone to justify something that’s set to make them some money. Fine. You go do your thing, and in five years, we’ll see if your intrusive advertising has succeeded or gone the way of the popup ads.

I’m not going to kick myself later because no matter how “successful” this is, it’s still intrusive and annoying, and I won’t subject my visitors to it. You, on the other hand, clearly have no concern for the desires of the visitors. Good for you.

The debate is not over. Just because it’s being done doesn’t make it right.

By: Rodney Brooks

Rodney Brooks — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:38:31 +0000

In response to Daniel’s post, Id like to quote fellow internet marketer Luke W. Parker from a post he made today on his blog.

“The debate is over. Do you think that 66 thousand advertisers and growing, who have already paid for 220 million ad plays per month really care what some people with a lower-than-average noise-annoyance threshold feel? That would be bad business.

Make no mistake at all, Audio Ads really are about to be bigger than Television Adsâ€¦ Itâ€™s a 3rd-party audit-approved FACT.”

Make a note of this Mr. Clark. Don’t kick yourself later for not taking advantage of this awesome opportunity.

By: Daniel M. Clark

Daniel M. Clark — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:24:50 +0000

They rock huh? From whose point of view? You know, pop-up ads were awesome from a certain point of view once upon a time, too. They were intrusive, obnoxious and irritating – just like pay per play ads.

Thankfully, the NoScript plugin kills them dead.

By: chalicemom

chalicemom — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:38:47 +0000

to:
Pay Per Play Ads rock! // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:36 pm
The Stats Are UP!
Try again!
chalicemom

By: Pay Per Play Ads rock!

Pay Per Play Ads rock! — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:36:35 +0000

I can’t wait to see the results. There are so many unknowns about pay per play ads, can anyone really tell how this is going to go?

I just wish they would get the stats back up. It is opening day and they are still down…

By: Loic kirie

Loic kirie — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:20:30 +0000

Net Audio Ads technology is going to change the way people earn a living on the internet. Gone are the days where you had to drive tons of useless traffic to your site only to realize that not even %1 conversion rate was achieved.

We must not forget that you will always have to depend on continuous fresh flow of traffic to your sites. This is the way you are going to be paid. Your traffic must be live and exposed to the 5 second audio ads in order to get paid.

I have talked to many Net audio Ads affiliates, and they all have the same concern. These days you can use endless sources of lead generation, most of which are unfortunately a complete waste of time and money.

In my experience, I have wasted thousands of dollars in every possible technique to drive traffic to my primary business, and in the end I couldn’t show any ROI at the end of each passing months. Until I discovered the mother of all premium lead generation system that has allowed me to get not only my primary business to thrive, but also four others.

Don’t forget I also had to rely on the conversion rate to my other businesses. Now with the Pay Per Play technology I am expecting to get paid on the thousands of visitors that come to my web site on a weekly basis, due to this robust and extremely professional lead generation system that is light years ahead of it time. don’t procrastinate, think “Daily Fresh Flow Of Traffic”

I wish all of you success with this new phenomenon that is sweeping the net.

Loic Kirie.
Marketing Director at
i3pmarketing
http://www.ippp.veretekk.com
ippp@veretekk.com